##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 30, 2025
Muhammad Yazid Abd. Rachim Gege Marshinta Marshinta Maliuddin Maliuddin

Abstract

This research aims to analyze in-depth the deviations of linguistic politeness principles manifested in the oral communication of students at Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri (SMAN) 2 Kendari through the lens of pragmatic analysis, grounded in Leech's politeness principle theoretical framework. Employing spontaneous conversation data from students in grades X, XI, and XII, collected through audio recording and verbatim transcription methods, this qualitative study identifies and classifies various forms of deviations from the maxims of politeness. The research findings indicate that the phenomenon of politeness principle deviation occurs quite frequently in verbal interactions among students, potentially leading to negative impacts on the quality of social relationships and the conduciveness of the learning environment at school. Furthermore, this research has implications for providing practical insights for educators in formulating learning strategies that explicitly emphasize the urgency of polite and ethical communication, as well as enhancing students' metacognitive awareness regarding the pragmatic consequences of their language choices in building and maintaining positive social interactions.

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

politeness, principle deviation, oral communication, pragmatic analysis

References
Anggrayni, L. O., & Supriyadi, T. (2022). Analisis Penggunaan Bahasa Vulgar dalam Interaksi Verbal Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, 7(1), 1-8.
Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.
Chaer, A. (2010). Kesantunan berbahasa. Rineka Cipta.
Culpeper, J. (1996). Towards an anatomy of impoliteness. Journal of Pragmatics, 25(3), 349-367.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. Macmillan.
Erikson, E. H. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis. W. W. Norton & Company.
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive-developmental inquiry. American Psychologist, 34(10), 906–911. 1
Ibrahim, A., & Syukur, S. (1992). Sosiolinguistik. Hasanuddin University Press.
Insani, Z. (2023). Persepsi Siswa Terhadap Penggunaan Bahasa Kasar dalam Interaksi Teman Sebaya. Skripsi tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Halu Oleo.
Kurniandi, R. (2023). Dinamika Interaksi Sosial dan Penggunaan Bahasa di Kalangan Siswa SMA. Makalah seminar tidak diterbitkan, Universitas Sulawesi Tenggara.
Lakoff, R. T. (1975). Language and woman's place. Language in Society, 4(1), 45-80.
Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.
Nadar, F. X. (2008). Pragmatik & pengajaran bahasa. Mitra Wacana Media.
Noddings, N. (2005). Caring in education. In L. C. Moll (Ed.), Encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 1, pp. 315-319). Macmillan Reference USA.
Tania, S. (2019). Pengaruh Penggunaan Bahasa Vulgar Terhadap Citra Institusi Pendidikan. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 5(2), 112-119.
Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.
How to Cite
Gege, M. Y., Marshinta, M., & Maliuddin, M. (2025). DEVIASI PRINSIP KESANTUNAN DALAM KOMUNIKASI LISAN SISWA SMAN 2 KENDARI: ANALISIS PRAGMATIK. Seshiski: Southeast Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 50-51. https://doi.org/10.53922/seshiski.v5i1.78
Section
volume 5 Nomor 1 june 2025